IT Audits & Controls Assessments
Scoped testing of access, change, operations, backup and vendor controls, with workpapers and a remediation plan.
- Access and privileged access
- Change management and development
- IT operations, backup and restore
Security, Risk & Compliance
Independent assurance and governance work for organizations that need to show, not assert, that their technology and AI are under control.
Five connected services: IT audits, cybersecurity assessments, GRC and compliance readiness, AI governance, and digital forensics support. Each engagement is scoped in writing, evidence-based and reported in language your leadership can act on.
The practice
Scoped testing of access, change, operations, backup and vendor controls, with workpapers and a remediation plan.
Authorized review of cloud, identity, configuration and vulnerability exposure with validated, prioritized findings.
Applicability analysis, risk and control registers, policies, evidence requests, vendor risk and remediation tracking.
AI inventory, intended use, accountable owners, vendor and model risk, human oversight, evaluations and monitoring.
Authorized corporate investigation support: preservation planning, evidence analysis, custody records and examiner-reviewed reporting.
How we work
Objectives, systems, period, evidence and recipients are written down first, so results are never ambiguous.
Findings are supported by artefacts we can show you, and untested areas are reported as limitations.
We separate fact from interpretation and avoid blanket compliance verdicts we are not in a position to give.
Every report ends with a sequenced plan, owners and effort, not a severity list nobody can act on.
FAQ
No. SOC 2 reports come from independent CPA firms, and ISO certifications from accredited certification bodies. We deliver readiness consulting, controls assessments and governance work that prepares you for those independent engagements.
Usually with an applicability conversation and a gap assessment. That establishes which requirements genuinely apply, what evidence already exists and whether your first priority is technical exposure, control discipline or documentation.
It can, and we often phase it: assess exposure and controls first, then build the governance and evidence programme, then extend it to AI systems. Phasing keeps cost and disruption proportionate.
Monitoring and incident-response support is scoped to your engagement, including coverage hours and response expectations written into the agreement. We do not advertise round-the-clock coverage as a standing service.
Yes, as separate remediation work through our IT consultancy and automation teams. Where independence matters for a third party relying on our assessment, we will say so before you decide.
Keep Exploring
Subscribe to receive the latest business insights, technology updates, company news, and useful ideas delivered to your inbox.
We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.